Several widely cited studies estimate that the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) could lift tens of millions of people out of poverty and add well over $100 billion to intra-African trade by the early 2030s. Those numbers get repeated often, but the assumptions behind them matter as much as the totals.
What the models assume
Most of these estimates come from computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, which simulate how tariff cuts and reduced non-tariff barriers ripple through an economy over time. The results are sensitive to a few key inputs: how quickly countries actually implement tariff schedules, how much "trade facilitation" (customs efficiency, logistics, border delays) improves alongside tariffs, and whether services and labour mobility are included at all.
Why the range is so wide
Papers that model tariff liberalisation alone tend to produce modest gains. Papers that also model deep trade facilitation reforms produce much larger ones — sometimes several times bigger. That gap is the real story: the size of the AfCFTA payoff depends less on the trade agreement itself and more on whether the harder reforms behind the border actually happen.
Why it matters for our work
For anyone tracking regional integration policy, the takeaway isn't "AfCFTA will or won't work." It's that implementation quality is the variable to watch, and it's the one most in political hands.
This is a placeholder post. Replace it with a real summary, and cite the specific papers you're drawing on.